

Non-lethal weapons have long been misunderstood by the general public, and by military and political leaders. Some see them as torture devices, others as nothing more than fancy toys that have no practical use. However, as security becomes more of a global issue and conflicts are more often than not unconventional, demand for more non-lethal weapons has risen. The world's conflicts and crisis's can be filmed and that footage can be distributed almost instantaneously. Field commanders are under stricter scrutiny than ever before, and that scrutiny can lead to second guessing. The escalation of force can quickly go from show to shout to shove to shoot, and can make for ugly footage on the nightly news or the web, and can lead to unnecessary deaths of bystanders, perpetrators, or soldiers. Giving field commanders more options especially in the shove to shoot range can prevent casualties on both sides of a conflict or situation. One such non-lethal weapon is the Active Denial System, developed by the Air Force. Detractors call it a death ray, while the Pentagon deems it a viable weapon for crowd control, defense, and anti-sniper applications.
The Active Denial System uses "millimeter wave electromagnetic energy to stop, deter, and turn back and advancing adversary from a relatively long range" according to
globalsecurity.org. The system uses 95-GHz millimeter waves which can be pinpointed towards a subject. The waves only penetrate 1/64 but cause an intense burning sensation which ends when the system is turned off, redirected, or the subject moves out of the ray's beam. The beam can heat the skin to 130 degrees Fahrenheit in only two seconds, but the body's natural defense systems compel the subject to move out of the way or turn back in less than a second. The Air Force states that a subject would need to stand in the beam for 250 seconds to be burned by the system. There has been some speculation of injuries or mass slaughter of animals at the hands of this "death ray." Sharon
Wienberger at the Danger Room at wired.com sites a former Air Force Office of Special Investigations Officer, Dave
Gaubatz, that he "truckloads of animals being brought in in the middle of the night." He claims these animals, including 500 pound cows, were being slaughtered by the ray.
Gaubatz also claimed to have found Saddam's
WMD bunkers.
The system, while promising, has curiously yet to be cleared for deployment in Iraq or Afghanistan. According to Danger Room's David
Hambling at wired.com troops are "...begging for the Active Denial System..."
Hambling sites the Defense Science Board's report on why the system has not been deployed to Iraq where it could be used for crowd control and for anti-sniper operations with little or no collateral damage. The report sited an unfavorable political atmosphere after the
Abu-
Ghraib scandal which would attract intense media attention and scrutiny if the system were to be employed in a detainee operations mission. Also the deployment of the system would require "
significant education and awareness for military personnel and the general public to understand." In other words more money would have to be spent on training troops and educating the public on the system. Once again lives lose out to the almighty dollar. The most promising application of the system is in an anti-sniper role. The weapon could be directed into sniper hides, or positions, which would force the sniper to move while not putting innocent bystanders at risk or causing collateral damage to buildings or infrastructure. The Board's report gave no indication of an imminent approval for deployment of the weapon.
On a personal note I have seen this weapon in action and felt its effectiveness. I took part in a non-lethal weapons capability exercise at
Kaneohe Marine Corps Base in Hawaii. The exercise demonstrated numerous non-lethal weapons for military high brass and politicians. Among the weapons demonstrated was the Active Denial System. I can tell you that the the system works, and though it is painful, the pain quickly subsides and it had no lasting effects. I also witnessed numerous incidents while deployed where this weapon could have been effective, but the weapon was unavailable.
This weapon can save lives, lives of our troops, of civilian demonstrators, of innocent bystanders, or of rioting detainees. The system can be mounted on a
HMMWV, on a ship, on an aircraft, or it can be placed in a static location. It is versatile, effective, and mobile, yet the pentagon and the government refuse to allow its deployment. Perhaps there is something wrong with the system, in some ways I hope there is, because it would hate to think that the government can waste time and money investigating steroids use in baseball or spy-gate, but that it won't spend money on a system that can save the lives of troops, civilians, demonstrators, or detainees.